For eight years, Swiss savers faced negative interest rates, which meant that their money earned them nothing or even cost them. This situation was due to the ...
Philippe
If you compare Neon with N26, you are probably looking for an online bank with a credit card for traveling and for making payments in EUR.It is indeed very ...
If you compare Yuh with N26, you are probably looking for an online bank with credit card for travel and for your payments in EUR.It is indeed very ...
If you compare Neon with Revolut, you are probably looking for a bank account for travel and for your transactions abroad.It is indeed very interesting to ...
If you compare Yuh with Revolut, you are probably looking for smartphone banks, or digital bank that offers a multi-currency bank account for traveling and for ...
Yapeal Promo code
Yapeal stops opening new private accountsSince March 31, 2025, Yapeal no longer allows the opening of new accounts for private individuals. The Swiss ...
How much is the interest rate of Neon Bank The interest rate of Neon Bank is 0.00% inHere is what we can read on Neon's Pricing page:Interest on ...
Revolut has established itself as one of the leading neobanks in Europe, especially popular among travelers and border commuters in Switzerland. Its ...
A few weeks ago, Yuh Bank launched its highly anticipated app feature, YUH TWINT, and it has been met with enthusiastic approval!Previously, the only ...
If you're hesitating between Yuh Bank and Neon Bank, and you do not know which neobank is the most advantageous for you, here is a comparison that will help ...
Thank you very much for your insightful comment — it’s great to hear from someone who also uses Managed by Alpian.
You’re absolutely right about the fees. From my own portfolio, the Quarterly Management Fee entries confirm a 0.75% annual management fee, charged quarterly (around 0.1875% per quarter). For “Signature” clients, it’s indeed 0.69% per year. On top of that, there’s the TER of the ETFs used in the portfolio, usually between 0.10% and 0.30%, which brings the total cost close to 1%, as you mentioned.
Regarding the portfolio adjustments, what I’ve observed matches your description — small tactical reallocations, typically every couple of months. Alpian’s approach seems to favour strategic stability with limited active moves, which fits their digital private banking philosophy rather than short-term tactical trading.
Thanks again for sharing your experience — it’s always valuable to compare real-life feedback from other users!
Thanks a lot for your comment and for confirming this from a client’s perspective — that’s incredibly helpful.
If the app today only shows ITD (Inception-To-Date) performance without specifying that it’s TWR, and there’s no other breakdown (like TWR vs. MWR), then it’s fair to say that the methodology is unclear. You’re absolutely right: this makes it hard — if not impossible — to compare Alpian’s performance with other platforms that explicitly report TWR.
I originally received confirmation from Alpian that TWR was used, but clearly the current user experience doesn’t reflect that. I really appreciate your feedback, and I’ll update the review to flag this more transparently for readers.
Thank you very much for your detailed follow-up — and no worries at all about reposting!
You’re absolutely right to highlight the discrepancy. I did originally check with Alpian, and they stated that the performance figure was based on TWR (Time-Weighted Rate of Return), which is the GIPS-recommended standard. However, your observation is very valid: the earlier screenshot showed “TWR 3.7% (ITD)”, but today neither the app nor their website seems to mention TWR anymore.
If clients are now only seeing P/L (ITD), that strongly suggests a shift — either in reporting methodology or simply in transparency. And yes, P/L is not equivalent to TWR. This definitely makes comparisons with other banks and robo-advisors more difficult, which contradicts Alpian’s original claim of standardised reporting.
Thank you again for your insightful contribution — I’ll add a note to the article to reflect this concern more clearly. You’re helping make this resource better for everyone!
Thank you for your comment, I double checked with Alpian and this is what they say: This refers to TWR performance (time-weighted), which is the industry-standard practice (per the GIPS recommendations). It allows you to compare one platform’s performance to another’s by excluding the impact of cash flows.
All Swiss bank will comply with Automatic Exchange of Information.